Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Computervision Corp. v. US, 05-5014

A decision holding that plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of deficiency interest assessed and paid with respect to a particular tax year is affirmed where the court of federal claims properly granted a motion to dismiss an interest suspension claim on statute of limitations grounds, and correctly held that an interest netting claim failed to state a claim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/20/2006
  • Published 04/20/2006

Judges

  • DYK, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • John S. Brown, Bingham McCutchen LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were George P. Mair, Donald-Bruce Abrams and Matthew D. Schnall.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bruce R. Ellisen, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Eileen J. O'Connor, Assistant Attorney General;  Richard T. Morrison, Deputy Assistant Attorney General;  and Gilbert S. Rothenberg and Francesca U. Tamami, Attorneys.
Copied to clipboard