Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Kao Corp. v. Unilever US, Inc., 05-1038, 05-1049

A judgment in a patent action involving rights to a cosmetic skin-care product is affirmed over challenges to findings regarding inequitable conduct, the written description requirement, obviousness, noninfringement, and attorney's fees.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/21/2006
  • Published 03/21/2006

Judges

  • Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Arthur I. Neustadt, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants.   With him on the brief were Stephen G. Baxter and Richard L. Chinn.

  • For Appellees:
  • George F. Pappas, Covington & Burling, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants.   With him on the brief was Kevin B. Collins.   Of counsel were Scott C. Weidenfeller and Roderick R. McKelvie.
Copied to clipboard