United States Federal Circuit

Decision upholding agency defendant's antidumping duty determination and its refusal to correct certain alleged errors associated with plaintiffs' home market sales is affirmed where there was no error in a remand of the case to defendant, and defendant's determination and refusal to correct alleged errors were supported by substantial evidence and were in accordance with the law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/10/2006
• Published 01/10/2006

Judges

• MICHEL, Chief Judge., Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Geert De Prest, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With him on the brief were Terence P. Stewart and Jordan Taylor.   Of counsel were Lane S. Hurewitz, William A. Fennell, and Wesley K. Caine.


• For Appellees:
  
• Claudia Burke, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director.   Of counsel was Ada E. Bosque, Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.