United States Federal Circuit
Perricone v. Medicis Pharm. Corp., 05-1022, 05-1023
Summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement for defendant on claims in a patent infringement case involving methods of treating sunburns and skin damage is reversed where the district court erred in its anticipation analysis with respect to certain claims.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/20/2005
- Published 12/20/2005
Judges
- Before RADER, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Raphael V. Lupo, McDermott Will & Emery, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Charles R. Work, Mark G. Davis and David A. Spenard. Of counsel were Mary C. Chapin and Evan Parke.
- For Appellees:
- William J. McNichol, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Tracy Zurzolo Frisch, Maryellen Feehery and Heather A. Ritch. Of counsel was Charles L. Becker.