Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


Perricone v. Medicis Pharm. Corp., 05-1022, 05-1023

Summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement for defendant on claims in a patent infringement case involving methods of treating sunburns and skin damage is reversed where the district court erred in its anticipation analysis with respect to certain claims.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/20/2005
  • Published 12/20/2005

Judges

  • Before RADER, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Raphael V. Lupo, McDermott Will & Emery, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Charles R. Work, Mark G. Davis and David A. Spenard.   Of counsel were Mary C. Chapin and Evan Parke.

  • For Appellees:
  • William J. McNichol, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-cross appellant.   With him on the brief were Tracy Zurzolo Frisch, Maryellen Feehery and Heather A. Ritch.   Of counsel was Charles L. Becker.
Copied to clipboard