United States Federal Circuit

Decision of the United States Court of International Trade, holding that "critical circumstances" for purposes of applying antidumping duties, applied to certain importations of honey from China is reversed where substantial evidence did not support the finding of critical circumstances.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/20/2005
• Published 12/20/2005

Judges

• PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Ned H. Marshak, Grunfield, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Bruce M. Mitchell;  and Mark E. Pardo, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were Jeffrey S. Grimson, of Washington, DC and Adam M. Dambrov, of New York, New York.


• For Appellees:
  
• Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General and David M. Cohen, Director.   Of counsel on the brief was William J. Kovatch, Jr., Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were Robert LaFrankie, Berniece Browne and John D. Mclnerny, Attorneys.