United States Federal Circuit
Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex Int'l, Inc., 05-1006
In a patent infringement dispute concerning exercise apparatus, summary judgment of non-infringement is vacated and remanded for a determination of literal infringement and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents under the correct claim construction.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/16/2005
- Published 09/16/2005
Judges
- Before RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Larry R. Laycock, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas R. Vuksinick and David R. Todd.
- For Appellees:
- Casey K. McGarvey, Berman & Savage, P.C., of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellee Cybex International, Inc. With him on the brief was E. Scott Savage., Paul T. Meiklejohn, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for defendants-appellees The Nautilus Group, Inc., et al. With him on the brief was David M. Jacobson.