Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Cybex Int'l, Inc., 05-1006

In a patent infringement dispute concerning exercise apparatus, summary judgment of non-infringement is vacated and remanded for a determination of literal infringement and infringement under the doctrine of equivalents under the correct claim construction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/16/2005
  • Published 09/16/2005

Judges

  • Before RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Larry R. Laycock, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Thomas R. Vuksinick and David R. Todd.

  • For Appellees:
  • Casey K. McGarvey, Berman & Savage, P.C., of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellee Cybex International, Inc. With him on the brief was E. Scott Savage., Paul T. Meiklejohn, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for defendants-appellees The Nautilus Group, Inc., et al.   With him on the brief was David M. Jacobson.
Copied to clipboard