United States Federal Circuit
Timken v. US, 05-1030
The International Trade Commission's revocation of antidumping orders imposed on cylindrical roller bearings is affirmed over plaintiff's claim that the Commission failed to considered relevant economic factors in the context of the relevant business cycle.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/31/2005
- Published 08/31/2005
Judges
- DYK, Circuit Judge., Before MAYER, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Geert M. De Prest, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Terence P. Stewart and William A. Fennell. Of counsel were Jordan Taylor and Lane S. Hurewitz.
- For Appellees:
- Marc A. Bernstein, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson, Acting Assistant General Counsel., Matthew P. Jaffe, Crowell & Moring, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees NSK Ltd., et al. With him on the brief was Robert A. Lipstein., Donald J. Unger, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees NTN Bearing Corporation of America, et al. With him on the brief were Kazumune V. Kano and David G. Forgue., Mark E. Pardo, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman and Klestadt LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schäfer AG, et al. On the brief were Max F. Schutzman, Andrew B. Schroth, and Adam M. Dambrov. Of counsel was William F. Marshall.