Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Terlep v. The Brinkman Corp., 04-1337

In a patent infringement dispute concerning LED lamps, the district court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents as a matter of law.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/16/2005
  • Published 08/16/2005

Judges

  • LINN, Circuit Judge., Before BRYSON, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Nathan Price Chaney, Nolan Henry, PLLC, of Fayetteville, Arkansas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Mark Murphey Henry and James Aubrey Fussell.

  • For Appellees:
  • Gary A. Clark, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees.   On the brief was Hermann Ivester, Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C., of Little Rock, Arkansas.
Copied to clipboard