Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Guardian Moving v. Hayden, 05-1086

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals erred in ruling that plaintiff is not entitled to a price adjustment under FAR 52.222-43 for the increased costs it paid its employees under its contract with the National Security Agency during a contract renewal period.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/09/2005
  • Published 08/09/2005

Judges

  • MICHEL, Chief Judge., Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jed J. Babbin, Connor & Hannan, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for appellant., John E. Kosloske, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Steven J. Gillingham, Senior Trial Attorney.   Of counsel on the brief was William R. Buonaccorsi, Trial Attorney, Office of Counsel National Security Agency, of Fort George G. Meade, Maryland.   Also, of counsel was Thomas D. Dinackus.

Copied to clipboard