United States Federal Circuit
Datamize v. Plumtree Software, Inc., 04-1564
In a patent dispute concerning software, summary judgment of invalidity is affirmed where the patent's use of "aesthetically pleasing" does not meet the standards articulated in caselaw concerning definiteness.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/05/2005
- Published 08/05/2005
Judges
- PROST, Circuit Judge., Before CLEVENGER, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Theodore Stevenson, III, McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Amber Hatfield Rovner, of Austin, Texas. Of counsel was Douglas A. Cawley, of Dallas, Texas.
- For Appellees:
- Michael B. Levin, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Michael A. Ladra, David H. Kramer, Christopher R. Parry, and Bart E. Volkmer.