Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


Datamize v. Plumtree Software, Inc., 04-1564

In a patent dispute concerning software, summary judgment of invalidity is affirmed where the patent's use of "aesthetically pleasing" does not meet the standards articulated in caselaw concerning definiteness.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/05/2005
  • Published 08/05/2005

Judges

  • PROST, Circuit Judge., Before CLEVENGER, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Theodore Stevenson, III, McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was Amber Hatfield Rovner, of Austin, Texas.   Of counsel was Douglas A. Cawley, of Dallas, Texas.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael B. Levin, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Michael A. Ladra, David H. Kramer, Christopher R. Parry, and Bart E. Volkmer.
Copied to clipboard