United States Federal Circuit

In a patent dispute concerning satellite television broadcasting, substantial evidence supports the jury's verdict, which found plaintiff's claims invalid based on anticipation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/28/2005
• Published 06/28/2005

Judges

• Before SCHALL, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Michael K. Kellogg, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Richard H. Stern, J. Christopher Rozendaal, and Eugene M. Paige.


• For Appellees:
  
• James H. Laughlin, Jr., Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-cross appellants.   With him on the brief were Edward A. Pennington, Robert C. Bertin, and Thomas S. Valente.