United States Federal Circuit
Upsher-Smith Laboratories v. Pamlab, 04-1405
In a patent dispute concerning vitamin supplements, summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed where the disputed patents are invalid for anticipation and obviousness.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/17/2005
- Published 06/17/2005
Judges
- RADER, Circuit Judge., Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jacob M. Holdreith, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Ronald J. Schutz, Misti Nelc, Kimberly G. Miller, and Jonathan D. Goins.
- For Appellees:
- Glenn K. Beaton, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were J. Gregory Whitehair and Amanda J. Tessar. Of counsel on the brief was Mark A. Perry, of Washington, DC.