United States Federal Circuit

In a patent infringement dispute concerning silica products, summary judgment in favor of defendant is reversed where the evidence before the court created a genuine issue of material fact regarding one of defendant's accused products.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/11/2005
• Published 04/11/2005

Judges

• GAJARSA, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Eric H. Weisblatt, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With him on the brief were Monte M. Bond, Norman H. Stepno, Todd R. Walters, and Bruce J. Boggs, Jr. Of counsel on the brief were N. Richard Powers, James D. Heisman, and Rudolph E. Hutz, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, L.L.P., of Wilmington, Delaware.   Of counsel were Erin M. Dunston, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P., and James D. Heisman, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, L.L.P.


• For Appellees:
  
• John M. Skenyon, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief was Jolynn M. Lussier.