Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


MEDRAD, INC. v. MRI DEVICES CORP., 04-1134

In a patent infringement dispute concerning MRI machines, the district court properly granted summary judgment of invalidity since plaintiff's invention was anticipated by a prior art publication and invention.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/16/2005
  • Published 03/16/2005

Judges

  • BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • W. Thomas McGough, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Frederick H. Colen;  Kirsten R. Rydstrom;  and Robert D. Kucler.   Of counsel on the brief was Gregory L. Bradley, Medrad, Inc., of Indianola, Pennsylvania.

  • For Appellees:
  • James F. Hurst, Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Derek J. Sarafa and Brian R. Pollack.
Copied to clipboard