United States Federal Circuit
MEDRAD, INC. v. MRI DEVICES CORP., 04-1134
In a patent infringement dispute concerning MRI machines, the district court properly granted summary judgment of invalidity since plaintiff's invention was anticipated by a prior art publication and invention.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/16/2005
- Published 03/16/2005
Judges
- BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- W. Thomas McGough, Jr., Reed Smith LLP, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Frederick H. Colen; Kirsten R. Rydstrom; and Robert D. Kucler. Of counsel on the brief was Gregory L. Bradley, Medrad, Inc., of Indianola, Pennsylvania.
- For Appellees:
- James F. Hurst, Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Derek J. Sarafa and Brian R. Pollack.