United States Federal Circuit
BUSINESS OBJECTS v. MICROSTRATEGY, INC., 04-1009
In a patent dispute concerning improvements to searching relational databases, the district court erred in its finding of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/06/2005
- Published 01/06/2005
Judges
- RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Daniel J. Furniss, Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were Joseph A. Greco and Gregory S. Bishop.
- For Appellees:
- Peter E. Moll, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were James F. Valentine and Matthew E. Hocker of Menlo Park, California; and Richard L. Stanley of Houston, Texas.