Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


BUSINESS OBJECTS v. MICROSTRATEGY, INC., 04-1009

In a patent dispute concerning improvements to searching relational databases, the district court erred in its finding of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/06/2005
  • Published 01/06/2005

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Daniel J. Furniss, Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   Of counsel on the brief were Joseph A. Greco and Gregory S. Bishop.

  • For Appellees:
  • Peter E. Moll, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were James F. Valentine and Matthew E. Hocker of Menlo Park, California;  and Richard L. Stanley of Houston, Texas.
Copied to clipboard