United States Federal Circuit
CEMEX v. US, 04-1058, 04-1080
Defendants' unsuccessfully appeal the decision of the US Court of International Trade denying its motion to enforce the judgment entered against plaintiff, which was supposed to increase the amount of antidumping duties in which it was required to pay.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/28/2004
- Published 09/28/2004
Judges
- MICHEL, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Irwin P. Altschuler, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief was Jeffrey S. Neeley. Of counsel was David R. Amerine, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, of Washington, DC.
- For Appellees:
- David S. Silverbrand, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; and Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director. Of counsel on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel, International Trade Litigation, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, of New York, NY., Jeffrey M. Telep, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Joseph W. Dorn and Michael P. Mabile.