United States Federal Circuit
ELI LILLY v. ARADIGM CORP., 03-1336
In a patent dispute, the Court reversed the district court's denial of defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law on a joint inventorship claim since there was not sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury's conclusion that plaintiff's scientist was a joint inventor of a patent for the insulin analog "lispro".
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/20/2004
- Published 07/20/2004
Judges
- Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Donald E. Knebel,Barnes & Thornburg, of Indianapolis, IN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Todd G. Vare and Erin Roth Bohannon.
- For Appellees:
- Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Tharan Gregory Lanier of Menlo Park, CA, and Todd Geremia of New York, NY.