Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


GOLDENBERG v. CYTOGEN, INC., 03-1409

In a medical patent case concerning Tumor Localization and Therapy, the court affirmed summary judgment for defendants on literal infringement claims, but reversed summary judgment of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/23/2004
  • Published 06/23/2004

Judges

  • Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael D. Kaminski,Foley & Lardner, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With him on the brief were Harold C. Wegner, Stephen B. Maebius, Kenneth E. Krosin, and George C. Best. Of counsel was James M. Silbermann.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bradford J. Badke, Dewey Ballantine LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees.   With him on the brief were Harvey Kurzweil and David F. Owens.   Of counsel on the brief were Cecil E. Key and Robert A. King, of Washington, DC.
Copied to clipboard