United States Federal Circuit
GOLDENBERG v. CYTOGEN, INC., 03-1409
In a medical patent case concerning Tumor Localization and Therapy, the court affirmed summary judgment for defendants on literal infringement claims, but reversed summary judgment of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/23/2004
- Published 06/23/2004
Judges
- Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael D. Kaminski,Foley & Lardner, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Harold C. Wegner, Stephen B. Maebius, Kenneth E. Krosin, and George C. Best. Of counsel was James M. Silbermann.
- For Appellees:
- Bradford J. Badke, Dewey Ballantine LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Harvey Kurzweil and David F. Owens. Of counsel on the brief were Cecil E. Key and Robert A. King, of Washington, DC.