United States Federal Circuit

The Court of International Trade correctly determined that the same-person methodology for calculating a countervailing duty rate is not in accordance with law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/13/2004
• Published 05/13/2004

Judges

• RADER, Circuit Judge., Before MICHEL, RADER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kathleen W. Cannon,Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With her on the brief were David A. Hartquist and Eric R. McClafferty.   Of counsel were John M. Herrmann and Lynn D. Maloney.


• For Appellees:
  
• John McInerney, Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant.   With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director, and David D'Alessandris, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were Robert Nielsen and Dean A. Pinkert, Senior Attorneys, Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC., Stephen J. Marzen, Shearman & Sterling LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees.   On the brief were Thomas B. Wilner and Quentin M. Baird.   Of counsel were Robert S. LaRussa, Jeffrey M. Winton and Christopher M. Ryan.