United States Federal Circuit

The Court of International Trade's (CIT) decision 1) vacating the renewed finding of material injury by the defendant following remand from the Court of International Trade and 2) directing a finding of no material injury to the domestic industry from less-than-fair-value imports by plaintiff and three other Japanese makers, is remanded for further information collection, analysis and/or explanation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/03/2003
• Published 10/03/2003

Judges

• MICHEL, Circuit Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• John J. Mangan, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of Washington, DC for amicus curiae Bethlehem Steel Corporation, et al.   Of counsel were Stephen J. Narkin, Robert E. Lighthizer;  Kevin M. Dempsey and Alan W. Wolff, Dewey Ballantine, of Washington, DC., David I. Goldman, Associate General Counsel, United Steelworkers of America, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for amicus curiae United Steelworkers of America.


• For Appellees:
  
• Christopher A. Dunn,Willkie Farr & Gallagher, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.   With him on the brief were James P. Durling, Daniel L. Porter, and Robert E. DeFrancesco, III., James M. Lyons, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant International Trade Commission.   With him on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel;  and Laurent M. deWinter, Attorney.   Of counsel was Andrea C. Casson, Attorney., Roger B. Schagrin, Schagrin Associates, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant Weirton Steel Corporation.