United States Federal Circuit
DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. MEE INDUS., INC., 03-1117
Judgment of invalidity of two claims of a patent directed to improving the efficiency of gas turbines by increasing power output is reversed; district court erred in concluding that plaintiff did not carry its burden to establish damages because it failed to provide expert testimony on the damages issue.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/05/2003
- Published 09/05/2003
Judges
- DYK, Circuit Judge., Before CLEVENGER, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Arthur M. Lieberman,Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Keith D. Nowak and Abbey Green. Of counsel on the brief were William J. Schramm and Andrew M. Grove, Reising, Ethington, Barnes, Kiselle, Learman & McCullouch, PC, of Troy, MI. Also of counsel on the brief was Bruce M. Kanuch, The Dow Chemical Company, of Midland, MI.
- For Appellees:
- Harold E. Wurst, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Stephen D. Burbach and Brian L. Yates.