United States Federal Circuit

There is no appellate jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal of grant of two separate motions in limine, certified under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), which exclude evidence of damages relating to plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim as preempted by the federal patent laws of the US.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/28/2003
• Published 07/28/2003

Judges

• GAJARSA, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, GAJARSA and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Andrew Kochanowski,Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, P.C., of Southfield, MI, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was James J. Vlasic.   Of counsel on the brief was Michael H. Baniak, Baniak Pine & Gannon, of Chicago, IL.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ernie L. Brooks, Brooks & Kushman P.C., of Southfield, MI, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Frank A. Angileri and Mark Lorelli.