United States Federal Circuit

The Court of International Trade's decision affirming the Department of Commerce's Final Remand Determinations is affirmed where Commerce provided a reasonable explanation for its application of 19 U.S.C. section 1677(16) on antidumping duty orders.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/11/2003
• Published 06/11/2003

Judges

• MAYER, Chief Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, SCHALL and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mark E. Pardo, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.   With him on the brief were Max F. Schutzman, Andrew B. Schroth, and Adam M. Dambrov.   Of counsel was Jeffrey S. Grimson, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of Washington, DC.


• For Appellees:
  
• Lucius B. Lau, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States.   With him on the brief was David M. Cohen, Director.   Of counsel on the brief were John D. McInerney, Chief Counsel;  Berniece A. Browne, Senior Counsel;  and David R. Mason, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC., Geert De Prest, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee The Torrington Company.   With him on the brief was Terence P. Stewart.   Of counsel were Lane S. Hurewitz and Wesley K. Caine.