United States Federal Circuit

Because the district court erred in its interpretation of the claim language in a patent for fender liners of "dually trucks," denial of defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on the issue of infringement is reversed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/04/2003
• Published 06/04/2003

Judges

• Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Robert Gusinsky,Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, P.C. of Rapid City, SD, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant.   With him on the brief was Jay C. Shultz.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ernie L. Brooks, Brooks & Kushman P.C. of Southfield, MI, argued for defendant-appellant.   With him on the brief were Thomas A. Lewry and Michael S. Brodbine.