BIO-TECH. GEN. CORP. v. DURAMED PHARM., INC., 02-1195
In an infringement dispute over a patent for an oral contraceptive regimen, plaintiff provided evidence of menstrual shift evidence adequate to overcome defendant's motion for summary judgment.
- Decided 04/01/2003
- Published 04/01/2003
- BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
- United States Federal Circuit
- For Appellant:
- Charles A. Weiss,Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Richard L. DeLucia.
- For Appellees:
- George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Christine J. Siwik, and Christopher Shearer. Of counsel on the brief were William J. Sipio, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, of New York, NY; and Victor N. Balancia, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of New York, NY. Of counsel was Todd A. Wagner, Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, of Washington, DC.