United States Federal Circuit

BIO-TECH. GEN. CORP. v. DURAMED PHARM., INC., 02-1195

In an infringement dispute over a patent for an oral contraceptive regimen, plaintiff provided evidence of menstrual shift evidence adequate to overcome defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/01/2003
• Published 04/01/2003

Judges

• BRYSON, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Charles A. Weiss,Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was Richard L. DeLucia.


• For Appellees:
  
• George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Christine J. Siwik, and Christopher Shearer.   Of counsel on the brief were William J. Sipio, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, of New York, NY;  and Victor N. Balancia, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of New York, NY. Of counsel was Todd A. Wagner, Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, of Washington, DC.