United States Federal Circuit
SINGH v. BRAKE, 01-1621
<'*?;-ld of Patent Appeals and Interferences did not err in concluding that appellant failed to show: (1) that appellee was not entitled to a claimed filing date; and, (2) that appellant reduced an invention to practice before appellee's priority date.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/29/2003
- Published 01/29/2003
Judges
- LOURIE, Circuit Judge., Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Sharon E. Crane,Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, LLP, of Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. With her on the brief were R. Danny Huntington, Bruce T. Wieder, and Donna M. Meuth.
- For Appellees:
- Debra A. Shetka, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was Thomas E. Ciotti. Of counsel on the brief were Rachel Krevans and Jill Neiman, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of San Francisco, CA. Also of counsel on the brief were Robert P. Blackburn and Joseph H. Guth, Chiron Corporation, of Emeryville, CA.