United States Federal Circuit
MAHER v. US, 01-5076
Dismissal of a complaint was proper where plaintiffs failed to allege any set of facts which if true would establish privity of contract with the government, an implied-in-fact contract with the government, or that they were third-party beneficiaries of a contract with the government.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/19/2002
- Published 12/19/2002
Judges
- PROST, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- John O. Touhy, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- William G. Kanellis, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart E. Schiffer, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; Jeanne E. Davidson, Deputy Director; and Gary J. Dernelle, Trial Attorney.