Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


MUDGE v. US, 02-5024

A federal employee has a right to seek a judicial remedy for employment grievances subject to the negotiated procedures contained in his or her collective bargaining agreement, thus the Court of Federal Claims erred in dismissing a pay differential complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/17/2002
  • Published 10/17/2002

Judges

  • PROST, Circuit Judge., Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Larry J. Adkins, Deputy General Counsel, National Treasury Employees Union, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Gregory O'Duden, General Counsel;  and Barbara A. Atkin, Deputy General Counsel.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas B. Fatouros, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General;  David M. Cohen, Director;  and Todd M. Hughes, Assistant Director.
Copied to clipboard