United States Federal Circuit

A patent claim was not impermissibly broadened during reexamination, and plaintiff did not make a sufficient showing of indefiniteness to overcome the presumption of validity that attached to claims. Judgment of non-infringement via an on-press imaging system is affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/17/2002
• Published 09/17/2002

Judges

• Before CLEVENGER, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Robert G. Krupka,Kirkland & Ellis, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief were Boaz Brickman, Marc Cohen, Brian Arnold, and Nick Saros, of Los Angeles, California;  and Jay I. Alexander and Gregory F. Corbett, of Washington, DC.


• For Appellees:
  
• Daniel S. Ebenstein, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-cross appellant.   With him on the brief were Ira E. Silfin and W. Scott McClave.