Skip to main content

United States Federal Circuit


VANGUARD RESEARCH, INC. v. PEAT, INC., 01-1373

Dismissal of a declaratory judgment action alleging noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of a patent was improper, where a case or controversy existed between the parties based on plaintiff's reasonable apprehension that defendant would sue it for patent infringement in the future.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/09/2002
  • Published 09/09/2002

Judges

  • LINN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • W. Michael Holm,Womble Caryle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, of McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him on the brief was Steven D. Kerr. Of counsel on the brief were Gary C. Huckaby, Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, of Huntsville, AL;  and Thomas R. Folk, Reed Smith Hazel & Thomas LLP, of Falls Church, VA.

  • For Appellees:
  • Benjamin H. Albritton, Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., of Montgomery, AL, argued for defendant-appellee.   Of counsel was J. Mark Englehart.
Copied to clipboard