United States Federal Circuit
VANGUARD RESEARCH, INC. v. PEAT, INC., 01-1373
Dismissal of a declaratory judgment action alleging noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of a patent was improper, where a case or controversy existed between the parties based on plaintiff's reasonable apprehension that defendant would sue it for patent infringement in the future.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/09/2002
- Published 09/09/2002
Judges
- LINN, Circuit Judge., Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- W. Michael Holm,Womble Caryle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, of McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Steven D. Kerr. Of counsel on the brief were Gary C. Huckaby, Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, of Huntsville, AL; and Thomas R. Folk, Reed Smith Hazel & Thomas LLP, of Falls Church, VA.
- For Appellees:
- Benjamin H. Albritton, Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., of Montgomery, AL, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel was J. Mark Englehart.