United States Federal Circuit

A Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision, that there was no reduction to practice before a senior party's filing date, is supported by substantial evidence, thus judgment to the senior party in an interference was proper.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/12/2002
• Published 07/12/2002

Judges

• DYK, Circuit Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard P. Vitek, Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec, P.A., of Raleigh, NC, argued for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Roger L. Browdy, Browdy and Neimark, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellee.