United States Federal Circuit

TRINTEC INDUS., INC. v. TOP-U.S.A. CORP., 01-1568

Read TRINTEC INDUS., INC. v. TOP-U.S.A. CORP., 01-1568
READ

A customized watch catalogue did not anticipate, disclose, and enable each and every element of a process for production of faces for watches and other instruments, thus the claimed patent is not inherently anticipated, and should not have been declared invalid; remanded for findings on obviousness.

Appellate Information

Decided 07/02/2002
Published 07/02/2002

Judges

RADER, Circuit Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

For Appellant:
Robert A. Vanderhye,Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., of Arlington, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

For Appellees:
David P. Shouvlin, Porter, Wright, Morris, & Arthur, LLP, of Columbus, OH, argued for defendant-appellee. On the brief was David W. Costello. Of counsel was Richard M. Mescher.