Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


XEROX CORP. v. US, 01-1124

A proper Customs Protest is found where the scope of a U.S. Customs Service anti-dumping order is not being challenged, but rather appellant argues that the goods in question fall outside of that order, thus the Court of International Trade had subject matter jurisdiction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/06/2002
  • Published 05/06/2002

Judges

  • MAYER, Chief Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • John M. Peterson,Neville, Peterson & Williams, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.   With him in the brief were George W. Thompson and Curtis W. Knauss.

  • For Appellees:
  • James A. Curley, Attorney, International Trade Field Office, Department of Justice, of New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General;  David M. Cohen, Director, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC;  and Joseph I. Liebman, Former Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office.
Copied to clipboard