United States Federal Circuit
THAI PINEAPPLE CANNING INDUS. CORP. v. US, 00-1445
A single weighted-average cost for the period of review is not the proper methodology in computing antidumping margins during a period of rising costs when there is a significant lag time between the production of merchandise and its sale.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/06/2001
- Published 12/06/2001
Judges
- PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge., Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Arthur J. Lafave, III,Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Douglas N. Jacobson, and Shibani Malhotra.
- For Appellees:
- Lucius B. Lau, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. On the brief was David M. Cohen, Director. Of counsel were Berniece A. Browne, John D. McInerney, David W. Richardson, and Scott McBride, Attorney, Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.