United States Federal Circuit
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR INDUS. ASS'N v. INT'L TRADE COMM'N, 01-1060
Even though the high volume and low price of an imported product has some injurious impact on United States industry, where substantial evidence shows that other factors caused more material injury to domestic industry, the imports may not violate anti-dumping laws.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/21/2001
- Published 09/21/2001
Judges
- RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Christopher F. Corr,White & Case, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Of counsel was Lyle B. Vander Schaaf., Michael Diehl, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel; and Marc A. Bernstein, Acting Assistant General Counsel. Of counsel was James A. Toupin, Attorney., Gilbert B. Kaplan, Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Michael D. Esch, Paul W. Jameson, and Cris R. Revaz.