Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR INDUS. ASS'N v. INT'L TRADE COMM'N, 01-1060

Even though the high volume and low price of an imported product has some injurious impact on United States industry, where substantial evidence shows that other factors caused more material injury to domestic industry, the imports may not violate anti-dumping laws.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/21/2001
  • Published 09/21/2001

Judges

  • RADER, Circuit Judge., Before RADER, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Christopher F. Corr,White & Case, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees.   Of counsel was Lyle B. Vander Schaaf., Michael Diehl, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel;  and Marc A. Bernstein, Acting Assistant General Counsel.   Of counsel was James A. Toupin, Attorney., Gilbert B. Kaplan, Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant.   With him on the brief were Michael D. Esch, Paul W. Jameson, and Cris R. Revaz.
Copied to clipboard