Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Federal Circuit


PANNU v STORZ INSTRUMENTS, INC., 00-1482

Where a reissued patent improperly broadened claims in a manner directly pertinent to subject matter surrendered during prosecution, it is invalid under 35 USC 251, the recapture rule.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/25/2001
  • Published 07/25/2001

Judges

  • MAYER, Chief Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States Federal Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael C. Cesarano,Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., of Miami, FL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Edward W. Remus, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee.   With him on the brief was Jonathan R. Sick. Of counsel on the brief were Craig E. Larson, Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated, of Rochester, NY;  and Rita D. Vacca, Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Inc., of St. Louis, MO.
Copied to clipboard