United States Federal Circuit
PANNU v STORZ INSTRUMENTS, INC., 00-1482
Where a reissued patent improperly broadened claims in a manner directly pertinent to subject matter surrendered during prosecution, it is invalid under 35 USC 251, the recapture rule.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/25/2001
- Published 07/25/2001
Judges
- MAYER, Chief Judge., Before MAYER, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States Federal Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael C. Cesarano,Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., of Miami, FL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Edward W. Remus, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Jonathan R. Sick. Of counsel on the brief were Craig E. Larson, Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated, of Rochester, NY; and Rita D. Vacca, Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Inc., of St. Louis, MO.