Skip to main content

United States DC Circuit


Miller v. Hersman, 08-5494

In a sex and age discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) defendant failed to carry its burden to show that plaintiff did not timely contact an EEO counselor and thus did not exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2) plaintiff did not fail to respond to defendant's exhaustion argument.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/17/2009
  • Decided 02/05/2010
  • Published 02/05/2010

Judges

  • Before HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States DC Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David A. Young argued the cause for the appellant. Carl S. Nadler was on brief.

  • For Appellees:
  • Brian P. Hudak, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for the appellee. R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, was on brief.
Copied to clipboard