United States DC Circuit
Miller v. Hersman, 08-5494
In a sex and age discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) defendant failed to carry its burden to show that plaintiff did not timely contact an EEO counselor and thus did not exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2) plaintiff did not fail to respond to defendant's exhaustion argument.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/17/2009
- Decided 02/05/2010
- Published 02/05/2010
Judges
- Before HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David A. Young argued the cause for the appellant. Carl S. Nadler was on brief.
- For Appellees:
- Brian P. Hudak, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for the appellee. R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, was on brief.