Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States DC Circuit


Czekalski v. LaHood, 08-5431

In an action alleging that plaintiff's supervisor at the Federal Aviation Administration discriminated against her on the basis of sex by reassigning her to an inferior position, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the magistrate judge correctly instructed the jury on the relevant legal theory; and 2) plaintiff did not identify any evidence peculiarly available to defendant that it did not produce and that would shed light on her claim.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/13/2009
  • Decided 12/29/2009
  • Published 12/29/2009

Judges

  • Before GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges, and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States DC Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Ellen K. Renaud argued the cause for the appellant.  David H. Shapiro and Richard L. Swick were on brief.

  • For Appellees:
  • Darrell C. Valdez, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for the appellee.  R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorney, was on brief.
Copied to clipboard