United States DC Circuit

In a wrongful termination action alleging that Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff for reporting supervisors' misconduct, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed in part, where Plaintiff failed to provide pre-suit notice of his Whistleblower Act claims, but reversed in part, where there was an issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiff was an at-will employee.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/06/2009
• Decided 05/15/2009
• Published 05/15/2009

Judges

• Before:  HENDERSON, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• John F. Karl Jr. argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard S. Love, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, argued the cause for appellees.   With him on the brief were Peter J. Nickles, Attorney General, Todd S. Kim, Solicitor General, and Donna M. Murasky, Deputy Solicitor General.