United States DC Circuit

In a petition for review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) approval of a method of energy cost allocation based on net energy for load, the petition is denied, where FERC adequately explained any departure from its precedent.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/20/2009
• Decided 05/08/2009
• Published 05/08/2009

Judges

• Before SENTELLE, Chief Judge, TATEL and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David R. Poe argued the cause for petitioner.   With him on the briefs were Sonia C. Mendonca and Brett A. Snyder.


• For Appellees:
  
• Samuel Soopper, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent.   With him on the brief were Cynthia A. Marlette, General Counsel, and Robert H. Solomon, Solicitor.