United States DC Circuit
Pirlott v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 07-1025
In a suit alleging that a union violated its duty of fair representation, petitions for review of an NLRB decision that determined that the union's financial disclosures were adequate but also held that the union had not justified its expenditures are denied where: 1) the charging parties' claim was not properly before the court; and 2) the union failed to show that its organizing activities were permissible expenditures for objecting nonmembers' dues.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/08/2008
- Decided 04/18/2008
- Published 04/18/2008
Judges
- Before: RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Glenn M. Taubman argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Sherry Pirlott and David Pirlott., Frederick Perillo argued the cause for petitioner Teamsters Local 75. With him on the briefs was Scott D. Soldon., Glenn M. Taubman was on the brief for intervenors Sherry Pirlott and David Pirlott., Scott D. Soldon and Frederick Perillo were on the brief for amicus curiae Teamsters Local 75.
- For Appellees:
- Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, and Jill A. Griffin, Supervisory Attorney.