United States DC Circuit
Consol. Edison Co. of NY, Inc. v. FERC, 06-1025
Petitions for review of orders related to remedies available for electric service providers that experienced substantial price increases as a result of failures in a deregulated energy market are denied as FERC's denial of a remedy was not arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/16/2007
- Decided 12/18/2007
- Published 12/18/2007
Judges
- Before: ROGERS and GARLAND, Circuit Judges, and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Elias G. Farrah and William F. Young argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Rebecca J. Michael, Neil H. Butterklee, and James J. Dixon., Kenneth M. Simon argued the cause for intervenors KeySpan-Ravenswood, LLC, Long Island Power Authority, and NRG Power Marketing, Inc. With him on the brief were Mark L. Perlis, David P. Yaffe, Howard E. Shapiro, Steven A. Weiler, Robert C. Fallon, and Christopher C. O'Hara. James J. Bertrand entered an appearance.
- For Appellees:
- Jeffery S. Dennis, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John S. Moot, General Counsel, and Robert H. Solomon, Solicitor.