Skip to main content

United States DC Circuit


Muldrow v. Re-Direct, Inc., 05-7169

In case involving civil suit brought by parent whose son was murdered in defendant's care at a residential program for juvenile delinquents, judgment and damage award for plan tiff are affirmed over claims that the district court erred when it: 1) improperly excluded testimony by a police witness regarding the motive behind the murder; 2) improperly admitted expert testimony that was not contained in the expert's pretrial report; and 3) improperly instructed the jury regarding the standard for contributory negligence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/12/2007
  • Decided 07/03/2007
  • Published 07/03/2007

Judges

  • Before:  GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States DC Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David F. Grimaldi, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Andrew D. Roth, argued the cause, for appellee.   With him on the brief was Laurence Gold. W. Gary Kohlman entered an appearance.
Copied to clipboard