United States DC Circuit
Muldrow v. Re-Direct, Inc., 05-7169
In case involving civil suit brought by parent whose son was murdered in defendant's care at a residential program for juvenile delinquents, judgment and damage award for plan tiff are affirmed over claims that the district court erred when it: 1) improperly excluded testimony by a police witness regarding the motive behind the murder; 2) improperly admitted expert testimony that was not contained in the expert's pretrial report; and 3) improperly instructed the jury regarding the standard for contributory negligence.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/12/2007
- Decided 07/03/2007
- Published 07/03/2007
Judges
- Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David F. Grimaldi, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Andrew D. Roth, argued the cause, for appellee. With him on the brief was Laurence Gold. W. Gary Kohlman entered an appearance.