United States DC Circuit
King v. Jackson, 06-5149
In suit alleging Title VII violation by appellee's forcing appellant to resign for having opposed the appellee's refusal to renew its 2003 Affirmative Employment Plan, summary judgment for appellee is affirmed as Title VII only protects an employee's opposition to an "unlawful employment practice" and the refusal to renew the Affirmative Employment Plan is not unlawful.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/27/2007
- Decided 05/29/2007
- Published 05/29/2007
Judges
- Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert C. Seldon argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Molly E. Buie.
- For Appellees:
- Teal Luthy Miller, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and Marleigh D. Dover, Special Counsel.