United States DC Circuit

In case involving discrimination and retaliation claims against appellee, summary judgment for appellee is reversed as to the discrimination claim as evidence that accommodations made for appellant would not impose undue hardship, and that appellant was able to perform the essential functions of his job created genuine issues of material fact.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/10/2006
• Decided 04/06/2007
• Published 04/06/2007

Judges

• BROWN, Circuit Judge., Before:  HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mary G. Sprague, appointed by the court, argued the cause as amicus curiae for appellant.   With her on the brief was Donald R. Gordon, appointed by the court.


• For Appellees:
  
• Peter S. Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee.   With him on the brief were Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney.   Michael J. Ryan and William R. Cowden, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, entered appearances.