United States DC Circuit

Dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of action challenging defendant's strategy to achieve an "appropriate management level" for national wild horse and burro populations, and finding that challenges to policy for removal of wild horses were moot, is affirmed as plaintiff does not challenge any justiciable agency action.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/18/2006
• Published 08/18/2006

Judges

• Before:  HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Howard M. Crystal argued the cause for appellants.   With him on the briefs was Eric R. Glitzenstein.


• For Appellees:
  
• Todd S. Aagaard, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellees.   With him on the brief was Katherine J. Barton, Attorney.   Andrew C. Mergen, Attorney, entered an appearance.