United States DC Circuit
Brewers and Maltsters v. NLRB, 04-1278
The National Labor Relations Board properly ruled that Intervenor-Anheuser-Busch violated section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act by failing to bargain with plaintiff over the installation and use of hidden surveillance cameras.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/09/2005
- Decided 07/05/2005
- Published 07/08/2005
Judges
- Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Arthur G. Telegen argued the cause for petitioner Anheuser-Busch, Inc. With him on the briefs was Robert A. Fisher. John H. Henn entered an appearance., Arthur J. Martin argued the cause for petitioner Brewers and Maltsters, Local Union No. 6. With him on the briefs was Stacey A. Aschemann., Arthur G. Telegen and Robert A. Fisher were on the brief for intervenor Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Arthur J. Martin and Stacey A. Aschemann were on the brief for intervenor Brewers and Maltsters, Local Union No. 6.
- For Appellees:
- Philip A. Hostak, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney.