Skip to main content

United States DC Circuit


NAT'L TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. FED. LABOR RELATIONS AUTH., 03-1251

In a collective bargaining dispute, the Federal Labor Relations Authority erred in concluding that its proposals to define the scope of the duty to bargain mid-term constitute only a permissive subject of bargaining.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/10/2005
  • Decided 03/08/2005
  • Published 03/08/2005

Judges

  • Before:  SENTELLE, RANDOLPH and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States DC Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James W. McNeely argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dennis Lane, former Solicitor, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent.   With him on the brief was Cynthia A. Marlette, General Counsel.  Lona T. Perry, Attorney, entered an appearance., Henry S. May, Jr., John S. Decker, Catherine O'Harra were on the brief for intervenor East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC in support of respondent.  Paul M. Teague and Jennifer N. Waters entered appearances.
Copied to clipboard