United States DC Circuit

In a receivership proceeding, denial of a motion to recuse the district judge is affirmed, and defendant's attorneys must show cause why sanctions should not be imposed since their motion to recuse was frivolous and contained false statements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/17/2004
• Published 12/17/2004

Judges

• Before:  SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States DC Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Maney, pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants.   On the brief was G. Michael Nelson.


• For Appellees:
  
• Charles B. Wayne argued the cause and filed the brief for appellee Deborah Meshulam, in her capacity as receiver of the Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul A. Bilzerian, et al., Civil Action No. 89-1854 (SSH) Receivership Estate.