United States DC Circuit
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. FED. ENERGY REGULATORY COMM'N, 01-1345
The FERC did not act unlawfully in applying its 1995 Policy Statement in resolving a gas pipeline operator's proposal to implement rolled-in rates, and that statement is not unreasonable either facially or as applied in this case.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/08/2002
- Decided 01/17/2003
- Published 01/17/2003
Judges
- Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States DC Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Steven J. Kalish argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Denise C. Goulet and Irwin Popowsky., Michael J. Thompson, Jeffrey G. DiSciullo, David A. Glenn, Richard P. Bonnifield, Kenneth R. Carretta, Frederick W. Peters, and Charles H. Shoneman were on the brief for intervenors Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, et al. Gregory Grady entered an appearance.
- For Appellees:
- Timm Abendroth, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Cynthia A. Marlette, General Counsel, and Dennis Lane, Solicitor.